<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Malchome&#039;s Mind on Gaming &#187; PvP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mmo-report.com/category/wow-stuff/pvp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mmo-report.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts of a Hardcore Casual Metagamer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Combo Points have got to Change</title>
		<link>http://www.mmo-report.com/2010/04/combo-points-have-got-to-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mmo-report.com/2010/04/combo-points-have-got-to-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malchome</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cataclysm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PvE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PvP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wish List]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmo-report.com/?p=477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will keep this short and to the point.  After seeing the Cataclysm class changes preview of Rogue and Druid I feel the need to reiterate an opinion I have held for a while now. Combo points need to stack on the Rogue or Druid and not their target. I realize for PvP purposes this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will keep this short and to the point.  After seeing the Cataclysm class changes preview of Rogue and Druid I feel the need to reiterate an <a href="http://www.mmo-report.com/2009/07/rogues-and-a-little-feral/" target="_blank">opinion I have held for a while now</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Combo points need to stack on the Rogue or Druid and not their target. </strong> I realize for PvP purposes this will need to be looked at closely but the new ability of Rogues <strong>Redirect (81) </strong>looks really cool but lets be honest this is an ability that should not even need to exist and if it is needed then it is something that rogues should have from about level 10/20 on.  It is something that should be available for use while leveling.  Furthermore no Cat equivalent was mentioned, however this is another area where it could simplify the &#8220;John Madden&#8221; effect that was mentioned when dealing with the Feral Cat rotation or should I say management system.</p>
<p>If we are worried about having too much burst from having combo points stack on the Rogue/Cat then also change combo points to stack from 1-5 to 1-10.  This will add additional tweak points and granularity for damage and buffs.  You could have points 1-5 scale linearly and 6-8 by powers and for real fun and burst 9-10 exponential.  But the time required to get 9-10 combo points will be about 2X if we keep the current combo point generation rate.  But even if 1-9 was linear with an extra boost at 10 for flair would not be uncalled for.</p>
<p>Now if Druids get another ability to equal Redirect for Rogues then that would be acceptable, not ideal but necessary.  The real problem with the Druid class as a whole with the exception of Resto is all 3 other spec flavors directly parallel another class.  This is actually OK because it is the nature of the Druid to be able to shift and therefore change what they are emulating relatively easily.  This is less the case with Bears.  Unless you time something perfectly you are not going to be able to shift out of Bear while a boss is wailing on you to do something in Caster or Cat form.</p>
<p>However here is the thing if Blizzard does not want the paralleled classes to play like their brethren then they need to create completely unique mechanics and resources for each flavor of Druid.  This in the end is insane from a development standpoint let alone class balance.  So in the end Cat and Bear need to have at least 50% of the tools that Protection Warriors and Rogues have access to including fundamental role and mechanical abilities, just not the flavor abilities.</p>
<p>Things not to copy:</p>
<ul>
<li>Vanish, even though we want it.</li>
<li>Cloak of Shadows</li>
<li>Shadow Dance</li>
<li>Essentially most 41 and 51 point abilities.</li>
</ul>
<p>Things that are copied or need to be:</p>
<ul>
<li>Last Stand</li>
<li>Shield Wall</li>
<li>Hunger for Blood</li>
<li>Redirect(81), if it is implemented.</li>
</ul>
<p>Anyway I will beat the horse one more time, to sum this all up, since combo points are here to stay then they need to be on the player and not the target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mmo-report.com/2010/04/combo-points-have-got-to-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I am Ironman!</title>
		<link>http://www.mmo-report.com/2010/04/i-am-ironman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mmo-report.com/2010/04/i-am-ironman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malchome</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PvP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmo-report.com/?p=471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just want to thank Sandorian for letting me cap the 3rd time for the achievement.  I had gotten the previous 2 caps and was heading to the flag for the 3rd one when it was picked up in a large zerg.  So after catching up to the zerg I helped bring it back and cover [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mmo-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ironman.png"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-472 alignright" title="ironman_veryamorcon" src="http://www.mmo-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ironman-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><br />
Just want to thank <a href="http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Shattered+Hand&amp;cn=Sandorian" target="_blank">Sandorian </a>for letting me cap the 3rd time for the achievement.  I had gotten the previous 2 caps and was heading to the flag for the 3rd one when it was picked up in a large zerg.  So after catching up to the zerg I helped bring it back and cover the flag carrier while most others went to return the flag.</p>
<p>Getting it at level 11 was just outside the scope of my normal expectations that I decided to post about it with screen shot of course or it did not happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mmo-report.com/2010/04/i-am-ironman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Balance Druid &#8211; Another Idea for a new Balance Ability</title>
		<link>http://www.mmo-report.com/2010/04/balance-druid-another-idea-for-a-new-balance-ability/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mmo-report.com/2010/04/balance-druid-another-idea-for-a-new-balance-ability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malchome</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cataclysm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PvE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PvP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wish List]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmo-report.com/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So after reading a recent post on WoW.com by Murmurs : Tyler Caraway, about some possibilities to change the DoTs that balance druids have into something more interesting and that deal more damage, got me thinking about other new abilities that druids could get in Cataclysm. Now I have read the Stormrage book and one of the pivotal moments [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So after reading a recent post on WoW.com by <a href="http://www.wow.com/2010/04/02/shifting-perspectives-dots-a-different-direction/" target="_blank">Murmurs : Tyler Caraway</a>, about some possibilities to change the DoTs that balance druids have into something more interesting and that deal more damage, got me thinking about other new abilities that druids could get in Cataclysm.</p>
<p>Now I have read the Stormrage book and one of the pivotal moments described a really cool concept for future druid possibilities.  I would call this ability Dream Cast, I don’t think they named it in the book if they did, I missed it.  Now that I have seen the<a href="http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=24038611737&amp;sid=1" target="_blank"> Shaman preview</a>, all I can say is well crap.  I initially envisioned an effect that is now very similar to the Elemental Overlord effect from the elemental tree, which is currently a talent Lightning Overlord.</p>
<p>So what I was initially envisioning would be a talent that when activated for the next  say 12 seconds every spell you cast a dream version of yourself would also casts it at the same time with the same buffs ect, and deals x% of damage of the base cast regardless of whether you normally hit or miss.  The lore perspective would be your dream version in the Emerald dream is casting at the same target as you are.  It would be a mix of Elemental Overlord/ and Mirror Image.</p>
<p>Ways to tweak this further would be to change duration and what spells it effects.  Initially I thought all spells would be duplicated but upon thinking about it further I think it should be like the old Elemental shaman talent Lightning Overlord.  It would only affect Wrath and other Nature based Damage spells maybe even including Dream Treants, which would look cool.  The dream form should show up as an effect but not be targetable given the short duration.  But the benefits and considerations are all tweak points.</p>
<p>Well given the release of the Druid information coming Friday this idea/concept is probably a bit too late but I thought still worth mentioning and maybe starting some discussion somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mmo-report.com/2010/04/balance-druid-another-idea-for-a-new-balance-ability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hacker Report</title>
		<link>http://www.mmo-report.com/2010/01/hacker-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mmo-report.com/2010/01/hacker-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 02:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malchome</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PvP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Warcraft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmo-report.com/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would not normally do this but I was really pissed off by a player in a WSG.  Some horde player, Dontblinkk of Trollbane was some how exploiting and was able to return the flag 3 times in the first 2 minutes of game.  The first time occured as we were barely out of our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not normally do this but I was really pissed off by a player in a WSG.  Some horde player, Dontblinkk of Trollbane was some how exploiting and was able to return the flag 3 times in the first 2 minutes of game.  The first time occured as we were barely out of our base and there would be no way for the horde to get that far without them being outside before the start of the match.  How they did it the second and 3rd time before we were even in their base is a mystery.</p>
<p>This match occurred 1/4/2010 around 9PM in the Ruin battle group.  If anyone sees this player before then beware and report them if anything funky happens.  I hope to hell they get a perma-ban for this.  Doing it once I would allow as a tester but 3 times in 2 minutes to win the match is unacceptable.  I hope the GMs check the logs on this one.  I submitted a ticket from my level 19 Draenei hunter.</p>
<p>Sorry for this slim and not informative blog post.  Other than to report there is now a definite hack or exploit still around for WSG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mmo-report.com/2010/01/hacker-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leveling more Alts&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.mmo-report.com/2009/12/leveling-more-alts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mmo-report.com/2009/12/leveling-more-alts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malchome</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patch 3.3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PvE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PvP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wish List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Warcraft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmo-report.com/?p=392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I have not posted in awhile.  There have been several reasons for this.  The two main reasons being a bit busy with work and not really getting around to post when at home, always more stuff to do in and out of game.  The other reason is that I really have just been waiting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I have not posted in awhile.  There have been several reasons for this.  The two main reasons being a bit busy with work and not really getting around to post when at home, always more stuff to do in and out of game.  The other reason is that I really have just been waiting for patch 3.3 to hit.</p>
<p>Because I have been waiting for 3.3 and the joy of the new LFG tool to finally be able to get random groups when ever I have time I have mostly stopped playing my level 80s except when raiding.  I have farmed some more badges and stone keeper shards for my new time filler.  Leveling several new alts.  I am currently working on a Mage, Rogue and Druid.  The cool thing that is keeping most of the mind-numbing bordom at bay when leveling the umpteenth toon through the lower levels is now I am skipping large blocks of zones especially in the 14-20 segment.</p>
<p>The reason I am able to do this and doing this is that I can now get XP in the Battlegrounds.  I use to hate battlegrounds while leveling before because they always seemed to be a waste of time and then there were the twinks.  Now my Mage and Druid with 2 Heirloom pieces of gear are a quasi Twink but no where as bad as they use to be.  With the turn XP off feature all of the serious Twinks have been moved to their own little bracket.  This means that the battlegrounds are now full of people just wanting to play a game or few to either level through BGs or just to get a break from the normal quest grinds.  Before getting to one of the more serious points and improvements that needs to be made to Battlegrounds I have to say playing a Rogue with 2 Heirloom daggers enchanted with Life-stealing is fun as hell.</p>
<h2><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Bracket Restructure</strong></span></h2>
<p>As the section title directly above states Bracket Restructure is one of the main things that needs to be done now that we have XP in Battlegrounds.  All BGs need to run from X0-X9.  Let the level cap players always be in their own separate bracket.</p>
<p>The reason for this is the end result of several previous PvP changes.  Lissanna, a mutual friend and I got into an argument about this on Sunday over vent.  Because it is player behavior Lissanna is of the opinion that no blame can be placed on Blizzard.  Ok so what is the combination of issues that is causing a problem?   It is a mix of XP in BGs bringing players of <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>All Levels</strong></span> into a BG instance and the level capped 80s only wanting 80s in their game using the AFK reporting tool to &#8220;kick&#8221; anyone of a significantly lower level out of the instance.  Because there are no repercussions for reporting someone AFK you can just do it to anyone for no particular reason.  This then causes the person to get the debuff and if they don&#8217;t do a certain action within a time frame they will be kicked and given the Deserter Debuff.  This occurred to our mutual friend in AV when they were killed and were running back to meet up with the group.  While they were dead they were reported and kicked while running back.  This type of crap can not be tolerated.  If a person is active and attempting to participate they deserve to be there unfortunately even if their performance sucks.</p>
<p>The report AFK tool has now become kick those that don&#8217;t agree with us and is now a device for griefing.  There needs to be a mechanism put in place that allows one to defend themselves from being wrongfully labeled.  Because there are legitimate reasons in battlegrounds to remain stationary to either defend or gather surveillance.    Especially if you are a Rogue or Druid since you can stealth and remain mostly hidden.</p>
<p>Yes as Lissanna pointed out this is a player behavior issue especially since the player base asked for such a system to be implemented.  However since we own nothing in the game it all belongs to Blizzard then they are also to blame.  The created the system and implemented it, and like many things they implement they don&#8217;t seem to stop and figure out all of the ways the system could and will be abused so that there are counter mechanisms in place to enforce better behavior or more fair play.  As in if you falsely report someone AFK then you are the one booted.  There should at least be a Query system to the player so that they can respond to their accusers directly.</p>
<p>Anyway I look forward to the PVP XP through level 70.  Afterward, looks like it will be impossible with the level cap Twinks behaving badly either because they don&#8217;t know better or are bored.  I suspect the later but ya never know.</p>
<p>I admit I don&#8217;t like seeing a non 80 in the BG when I run BGs on my 80s but I realize that the system allows them there and as long as they try I don&#8217;t have a problem with them being there.  I would prefer to see the level cap become it&#8217;s own bracket for just this reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mmo-report.com/2009/12/leveling-more-alts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rogues &#8211; Abilities, Specs and Weapons&#8230; WTF</title>
		<link>http://www.mmo-report.com/2009/09/rogues-abilities-specs-and-weapons-wtf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mmo-report.com/2009/09/rogues-abilities-specs-and-weapons-wtf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malchome</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cataclysm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PvE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PvP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmo-report.com/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was looking at MMO-Champion and in one of their posts where they collect Blue Posts I saw the following text.  It ties into some of what I want to say in this post so I thought I would include it for reference. Blue Posts from the Forums Here. Whenever we see comments like this, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking at <a href="http://www.mmo-champion.com/news-2/earth-wind-and-fire-video-blue-posts/" target="_blank">MMO-Champion</a> and in one of their posts where they collect Blue Posts I saw the following text.  It ties into some of what I want to say in this post so I thought I would include it for reference.</p>
<p><a href="http://blue.mmo-champion.com/28/19820517131-dead-tree--as-intended.html" target="_blank">Blue Posts</a> from the <a href="http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?sid=1&amp;topicId=19820517131&amp;pageNo=2&amp;ST=US-999437-dfF2Rpnmajuo5JJrWp0n2uWVFe5dOp6rcRe#28" target="_blank">Forums Here</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="color: #00ccff;">Whenever we see comments like this, we immediately assume that you have a different vision for class / spec / whatever than we do. If that is the case, you are likely to find yourself frustrated and scratching your head a lot when our changes never make the design converge on what you think it should be.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">Now, we do want Subtlety to be more attractive. All of the pure dps classes have a spec that isn&#8217;t as popular as the others. Mages may be the closest because at least Frost has a viable PvP use, but there are also plenty of mages who want to be able to use Frost in end-game PvE too.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">Subtlety (and Frost for that matter) are specs focused around utility. The problem is that players understandably nearly always choose damage over utility for raiding and often choose utility over damage for PvP, unless the damage is really high or the utility just doesn&#8217;t cut it for some reason.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">What we are talking about doing is sharing more of the utility among other specs, or the core class, so that there aren&#8217;t &#8220;utility trees.&#8221; To do that though, we have to make the way the different specs do damage different enough so that players might choose a play-style preference over highest damage. This is particularly challenging for rogues, who have a history of giving up a preferred spec or play style for one with a sub 1% dps increase.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">I think we are closest with the Arcane vs. Fire mage specs at the moment. They play a little differently, which goes beyond just the type of magic damage they do. While Fire might still do the highest damage overall, Arcane is close enough and plays different enough that even competitive players don&#8217;t feel stupid for playing that spec. There are a lot more Arcane mages out there than I think a lot of players assume.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">That is harder with rogues. &#8220;I&#8217;m the sneaky one&#8221; doesn&#8217;t translate into sustained raid dps. Assassination feels like it emphasizes poisons more and Combat feels like it emphasizes weapons more, so we&#8217;re a little closer there. Subtelty needs a stronger yet damage-oriented niche.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ccff;">HaT, sadly, is not a niche. HaT has scaling problems. It&#8217;s appropriate for a 5-player group, but gets too in larger groups with all of their raid buffs. We don&#8217;t want HaT to be the one talent that pushes players into Subtlety.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Now my Opinions of Rogue Gameplay</strong></span></p>
<p>I find the rogue class in general to be somewhat schizophrenic in tree and abilities.  Before the rogue lovers lynch me on this one let me explain more fully.</p>
<p>The three trees are Assassination/Combat/Subtlety and at least when I want to think of archetypes for these I would select Assassin/Swashbuckler/Street Thug.  The problem with these archtypes which the lore and theme of the trees seem to suggest is that the skill and weapon implementation don&#8217;t match up.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.mmo-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/32.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-289 alignright" title="Artemis Entreri" src="http://www.mmo-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/32.jpg" alt="Artemis Entreri" width="100" height="113" /></a>Assassin </strong>- Poisons, Bleeds with a nasty finisher are what this spec is suppose to bring to mind.  However when I am soloing or even in groups when playing assassination I end up putting my bleeds on to get <a href="http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=51662" target="_blank">Hunger for Blood </a>and then just go into a <a href="http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=48668">Eviscerate</a> and <a href="http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=48672#see-also-ability">Rupture</a> rotation of finishers to keep up <a href="http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=6774">Slice and Dice</a>.  Now I admit to not being the best rogue out there.  Hell I am lucky to be an average Rogue but , I seem to do acceptable damage for my gear, which is all I really strive for on any of my DPS classes.  The image to the right is of the miniature of Artemis Entreri from the Forgotten Realms setting of Dungeons and Dragons.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.mmo-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/inigo4.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-290" title="inigo4" src="http://www.mmo-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/inigo4-150x150.jpg" alt="inigo4" width="150" height="150" /></a>Combat </strong>- Swashbuckler so Swords and now Axes.  So essentially the dual wielding, one handed, melee monster.  The picture I selected for this is from the movie The Princess Bride, which I am sure most reading this post will be familiar with.  Now both the Dread Pirate and Inigo both really fit into the archetype for swashbuckler.  I will get into my issues with Rogue mechanics after highlighting the theme of each tree.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.mmo-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/2m3sl5c.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-291" title="Batman Logo" src="http://www.mmo-report.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/2m3sl5c.jpg" alt="Batman Logo" width="142" height="85" /></a>Subtlety </strong>- This tree is really about getting the drop on your target.  Which is why it is one of the harder trees to get a focus on for PvE.  It is really hard to get a drop on the boss, especially when they are pretty much immune to all of your lock down abilities.  Also given all the new amounts of AoE that bosses and their minions throw around being reliant on openers is a bit of a weak spot.  Now the image icon that I immediately think of when someone say stealthy and rogue one image comes to mind.  I don&#8217;t think I need to explain the image either.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Issues with Gameplay</strong></span></p>
<p>My first and foremost complaint about Rogue mechanics from the perspective of actually playing one, not QQing about them on the forums after getting ganked by one, deals with the  their specs and abilities interact with the weapons they use or lack thereof.  To put it simply too many of their abilities are weapon specific or have multiple caveats based on weapon.</p>
<p>Lets look at the other melee classes.  This gives us Druids, Shaman, Paladins, Warriors and Deathknights, now I am going to ignore Druids in this exercise, sorry those coming from Restokin because Druid feral weapon mechanics make it a moot point.  The other 4 classes that use melee weapons with a very few exceptions do not have their specs and abilities drastically changing based on the weapon they have equipped.  For all intents and purposes an Axe = Sword = Mace = Dagger for one handed weapons and 2H-Sword = 2H-Mace = 2H-Axe = Pole-arm for calculating damage.  Now I know there are some weapon specializations in the Warrior Arms tree but in all of the other trees the specific type of weapon in irrelevant and only the broad category matters, 1H versus 2H.</p>
<p>After looking at some of the source code for Rawr, which is a very useful dps/tanking modeling program, from the equations these differences especially for the Rogue are because they use Average Weapon damage to calculate the damage value of special abilities.  This is why certain classes want a slow main hand weapon, because as damage output for such abilities increases as the time between swings increases.  This is because to maintain a consistent DPS for a tier of weapons if the swing timer goes up so must the average damage per swing.</p>
<p>Now when I first started looking into this I went to WoWhead and copied the names of about 30 1 handed and 2 handed weapons.  I then looked at the min damage and max damage that each weapon would do before taking anything else into consideration.  The really cool thing was that on average over all any weapon&#8217;s min and max damage when compared to the average of the 2 values is +/- 30%.  The gambit of values were between at 28.9 &#8211; 31.1 so a quick eye balling of the numbers tells you it hovers around 30%.  So what this means is that if we want all special abilities to scale equally based on the DPS of the weapon.  Then we just need to take the DPS * (.7 &#8211; 1.3) + all other modifiers.  This then removes the weapon speed component from the formula directly as it is an intrinsic part of the DPS.</p>
<p>If we were to base special ability damage off of DPS and not weapon damage.  Then this means that Back-stab, Mutilate and any other abilities that may have a limit placed on them because of previous weapon speed dependency  can have it removed.</p>
<p>This was very annoying when leveling Assassination because there were so few Dagger upgrades while leveling.  Ya there are a good amount at 80 but you can get a good pair late 60s/early 70s and then one more set at 76 then nothing until you get the crafted epic or run dungeons at 80.  If you go combat then you loose several of your abilities because they are dagger restricted.  Also as a side note it is really stupid conceptually to have Dagger Main hand and  something else much larger off hand.  When ever I have been fencing with 2 weapons you almost always put the heavier weapon in your main/stronger hand.  Now you may lead with the dagger based on stance and positioning but saying you can&#8217;t backstab because your dagger is in your &#8220;off&#8221; hand is kinda dumb.   It should be as long as a dagger is equipped you can backstab.  The code just checks for first available Dagger.  If you are dual wielding daggers it goes from the main hand otherwise it uses the off hand.</p>
<p>Now the one thing this modification would not affect would be the benefit of a fast off hand for rogues when it comes to energy regen.  I really don&#8217;t have a problem with this, however I would say for modeling and balancing purposes that ability should go to a Procs per Minute system.  Similar to the HaT and or the Feral Druid leader of the pack restriction.</p>
<p>All I can say is that I hope that in the 4.0 changes Rogues get an overhaul so that each tree is focused on a couple of weapons each.  The close quarters combat daggers should be merged into the assassination tree because you almost always would go deep in Assassination then go into combat for those first 15-18 talents.  This is where with the new talent allocation screen where you see all 3 trees at once you could start putting interesting talents in the first few tiers of each tree that require talents in 2 trees.  Keep them on the edge with the associated tree.  Assume that to the left of Assassination was Subtlety and the opposite for Subtlety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mmo-report.com/2009/09/rogues-abilities-specs-and-weapons-wtf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
