Malchome’s Mind on Gaming

Crafting

Auction House Web Access – Other Improvements Needed First

by Malchome on Feb.03, 2010, under Cataclysm, Crafting, Wish List, World of Warcraft

By now the news has spread the Blizzard will eventually implement in game Auction House(AH) Access into the Armory, the signed in portion of course. I saw it mentioned first on mmo-champion which points to a WoW Forums post.

I think this is a really cool idea, I won’t be using this feature most of the time, but definitely something I will be using at other times. Especially since theoretically you could be on 1 character of the account and check the AH on other servers and or the Bank Alt of the same account. But they may put something in place such that is that account is logged into the game no character on that account could be checked. We will have to see.

Over all I like this idea but lets be serious the current AH in game feels like a quick fix that was added at the last moment to at least have some sort of an in-game economy going. The default interface is a pain in the ass and even with Auctioneer and other Add-ons it is still extremely tedious and a bitch to find stuff if you are just browsing. If you know exactly what you want it works otherwise it fails.

Out of the 4 in game AH like interfaces I have dealt with directly and several, more than 3, others I have heard about only 1 stands out as actually being something different, robust and useful.  EVE-Online is the only MMO I have seen that actually has a robust and useful economic interface.  I believe it is this way because, crafting and the economic game are actually acceptable play styles in EVE.  Whereas in all of the other MMOs I have dealt with and heard about those systems, crafting and trading, seem to be a quick fix to add features.

So what am I suggesting or IMO is needed. A complete overhaul of the AH. Yes our bag space may be limited by stack size but why the hell should the AH. The AH like everything in the game is ultimately a series of entries in a Database. Currently it seems like 1 entry in said DB has a stack size limitation. This is insane.

The following are IMO the way to make the AH sing.

  • 1 entry in the AH per Item of unlimited quantity (ultimately an unsigned Int of either 8/16/32bit in size. 16 would be the best since dust and some rep items could get into the hundreds easily.)
  • The biggest and most important one,  list Buy Orders
  • Fully customizable search for gear.
  • Wild Card Search-able for Name Text
  • iLvL
  • eLvL
  • Quality(Pick-able, not Lowest filter.) If I want to find a green item I want to see green, not green, blue, and purple.
  • Stat Search X [<|>|=] of Y Stat [Str|Agil|Stam|Int|Spr|SP|AP|Armor|Crit|Hit|Haste|ect....] Repeatable so add additional filters.
  • Price History (at least past week) so we can in game see the price trends over the past week. (Min, Max, Avg) of both Price listed and Price Sold. Maybe a separate graph showing # sold at what price through Bid and Buyout.

Essentially look at what EVE-Online has for an in game economic interface and make something similar with the Blizzard polish, because I really can’t think of any way to really improve the EVE interface, I just know that I like it and it would be great to have something similar in WoW. Unfortunately for EVE it is about the only thing I really like in the game but I will save my dislikes of EVE for another post sometime.

Leave a Comment more...

Initial Review of Patch 3.3 and Projection to Cataclysm – Part 1

by Malchome on Dec.16, 2009, under Cataclysm, Crafting, Patch 3.3, World of Warcraft

Well patch 3.3 has come out and there was much rejoicing.  I will avoid discussing the Raid content.  I may be raiding it but it is not my main focus of this blog or even my usual goals so I will save comments on it for another day, most likely after the second wing opens in January.

Titanium Market

I am sure others around the web were complaining about Titanium ore/bars after 3.2 and the epic gem fiasco but I did not see many suggest the change that I did about a week before I saw the transmute changes hit the 3.3 patch notes.  I was ecstatic to see them in there and then actually find that it was implemented when the patch went live.  I say that because I think it was lacking from the official 3.3 notes.  Anyway the one thing I was surprised about was the speed of which the change propagated throughout the market.  It took less than a week for the cost of 1 bar of Titanium to be equal to or now even less than the saronite to transmute into the Titanium bar.  Which is to be expected a little bit.  On my transmute spec Alchemist about 1 in 10 transmutes is a double or greater proc.  One time I got 4 titanium bars from one transmute.

This trend should hopefully continue.  There are one or 2 more such improvements could come in lesser 3.3.x patches but especially for Cataclysm we need more of these market stabilizers.  How this happens is at initial release of content there are certain fixed quantities.  These are node spawn locations.  The initial patterns for each crafting profession seem to be somewhat modeled off of the rarity of the fixed materials.  Then comes the raid and patch content.  They will occasionally add in a few or many new recipes however they usually seem to revolve around a new resource that is added in specific content, i.e. Runic, Crusader Orbs and Epic Gems.  In the case of Epic gems one of the ways to acquire them was from prospecting a previously non-prospect-able ore.  This caused the Titanium ore/bar price issue I refer to earlier.  A similar area that could currently have the same market transition applied is the Eternal Market, which was the Primal Market in BC and Elemental/Essence in Vanilla.

I.E. like with the saronite -> titanium transmute we need to have the elemental/primal/eternal cool downs removed.  This will mean that rather than the following table.

Per Eternal

Fire – 30g
Water – 20g
Life – 25g
Earth – 7g

Over time we will get the following.

Fire – Xg
Water – Xg
Life – Xg
Earth – Xg

I suggest this because the cost to produce an item in the materials used seems to expect the Earth,Fire,Wind,Water,Life Eternal items to be worth the same and they are not.  This would make them be the same.  Oh and to prevent infinite Eternal, Primal, Elemental items the Transmute spec Proc should be removed, I know I have one and that will be annoying but we need a straight conversion here, or at least make it a 1/1000 chance.  So if you do spend a lot of time and I mean a lot of time constantly transmuting you can get more out than you put in but that really is not the point of this suggestion.

Currently Transmutation is the key trans-formative process in WoW to convert materials.  I don’t think this should change but ultimately if such conversions were to be extended adding more to enchanting would also be useful.

To further extend this idea, I hope we see improvements along the following lines in Cataclysm.

Generic Gathering -> Refined Raw Materials -> Processed Materials -> Basic Components -> Complex Components or Finish Product.

This progression is an extension of the current Inscription/Jewel Crafting/Engineering crafting process.  I have focused on these 2 professions 1 because Inscription is the newest and one of the better organized profession that Blizzard has made yet.  Jewel Crafting was the profession added in The Burning Crusade and is an iteration more advanced than Engineering which was evident when skilling it up.  Engineering is one of the best professions because you actually use items you create at lower skill in patterns of higher skill.  So there is an intrinsic recycling of materials which in some cases make certain parts of the skilling up process extremely cheap.

So for Alchemy/Inscription you would get something like the following.

Generic Herb (Skill Level x-y), -> Named Herb (Gold Clover, ect) -> Pigment Process -> Specific Ink -> Inscription, Glyph, etc….

Essentially we need to add a generic level appropriate material that is gathered, so Mining nodes would become like Taconite or some similar material.  Then different fantasy rock compositions can have a chance to produce current ore in different quantities per stack of 5, like how other professions, prospect, mill etc.  For Alchemy I think we need to add a layer from herb -> (potion, elixir, flask).  Rather than use raw herbs it should be processed into powders and extracts, same with enchanting.  Actually Alchemy and Enchanting should become more closely related and cross feed into one another.  Actually come to think of it we already have rough, dense, solid stone coming form mining nodes.  If we convert everything to a stone type as the node rather than the mineral or elemental name that would be a good starting point.

As for enchanting I think we should also have some extra gathering process that comes from extracting the magical essence from corpses like skining, herbing, and mining.  This would be an alternative method to get Essence of Undeath, Living Essence , Essence of Fire, you get the trend.  I also think fel and moon cloth should now be mutually exclusive and are made like spellweave, moonshroud, ebonweave is currently and add an extra one for spellweave equivalent and then we have a parallel between 0-300, 301-375, and 376-450.

I also think that enchanters should have an alternative process to create the special cloths.  Now I know most enchanters are tailors as well or at least use to be, so that may be overkill but we really need new alternative ways to balance out high end materials.  There should always be more than one way to obtain any crafting material.  Even if it is through an exchange vendor it will help to keep AH prices from getting to extreme.

Well that went a little longer than I expected.

Leave a Comment more...

Crafting to mini-game or not to mini-game.

by Malchome on Sep.25, 2009, under Cataclysm, Crafting

So I was planning on releasing my next post as one on Rogues that I have been working on but after seeing a few things in my blog reader I changed my mind.

Ok so I read Tobold’s post about Design principles for crafting and economic systems.  In general he has a nice summary of some of the things that need to be considered when designing a crafting and economic system in a game.  I have thought about the subject at length over the years that I have been playing WoW.  In Tobold’s post he mentions another blogger’s post about crafting interfaces.  Now I looked around Ixobelle’s site a bit and read most of the post that Tobold mentions.  I say most because as soon as I got about half way through I immediately wanted to post here about the subject.

Ixobelle has some very good ideas for a crafting system and an interface for crafting.  I just don’t think they would fit into WoW unless there were major and I mean major overhaul of all crafting and market systems.   While I see the possibility of large changes coming to crafting in Cataclysm I don’t think the changes will be that drastic.  I can also say with 100% certainty that if the crafting system was changed to something like Ixobelle suggests then I would not craft at all.  Not saying that the system would not be a good one, just that it would be a system that was so time and concentration intensive that I would not want to deal with it.

Now I now the question that some may ask is how do you know that you would not want to use such an involved crafting system.  The answer to that is simple, been there done that, thanks but no thanks.  Vanguard boasts about being able to level up as a crafter.  There are 3 facets to your character that can all have independent levels: Adventurer, Diplomat, Crafter.   The system and process that Ixobelle describes is much like Vanguard in the grind-fest that is the crafting process.

The Marketplace

Now one thing that I can agree with between the 2 posts is that WoW needs a new market system regardless of any crafting changes coming.  Also when it comes to the market place be it vendors and or the AH we need to get away from the stack concept.  What I mean by this is that items in the AH are no longer sold in stacks or as individual items.

  • You list items as a total number of items sold of a given type buy a player at a given price.  No more of 3 pages of infinite dust in stacks of 1 sold by the same person.  Yes I have done it to make gold, it is a prickish move I hate everyone that does it even myself when I do it.
  • All AH actions should be queued and on a 1 minute basis all in game mail is sent at once.  This will allow the AH to bundle items into a single mail of up to 12 items or multiple emails 12 stacks at a time.
  • When you buy or sell items to set the number you want to buy.  You then buy that many from that user or as many as they have left.  Since someone may have been able to buy from them at the same time.
  • The auction house is no longer a system of only sell orders.  Users are able to put gold in escrow with the AH to auto buy X items at Y price if a user selects their buy orders.  See EVE-Online’s market.
  • All named static items are now statically listed in the AH whether there are any on the market or not.  Only thing not able to have Buy Orders placed in advance are for random generated items.  So all BoE world and Dungeon drops that are not random (of the bear) types are enumerated in the AH, additionally all crafted unbound reagents, materials, and crafted Items should also be enumerated.  Players are then able to set buy orders.
  • A buy order contains – Player A will buy N Number of Items X at Price Y for the next Z hours(days).

This somewhat involved change would go a long way in improving WoW’s ingame economy.  Currently there is only a trend that over time will deflate prices into absurdity.  However with the buy side of the equation added there will also be inflationary forces in the market.  This will eventually act as a stablilizing force where the buy and sell order price will approach the same value.

Crafting System minor upgrade

Before WoW gets anything like a more involved crafting system it needs to have a bit of a general overhaul first.  The following things I would hope get considered before anything overly drastic is done with how we craft.

  • Full itemization on what we craft.  All slots of a character’s gear should be assigned to a crafting profession.  Not a proposed system that will be implemented 2 expansions from now.  But all slots and item times allocated to one or more professions.
  • Renormalization of crafting materials required. The items we need to craft with are the resources available at the levels we would normally be encountering them and the gear crafted is useful to characters that are actually leveling the profession.  I finally get enough Thorium to buy and craft the chest piece when I hit 60 not the level 52 that the item may be.  You would now level past the point of usefulness just by gathering the resources yourself.
  • Add an intermediate crafting material stage to all professions, similar to Engineering making parts first then crafting an item later.  Blacksmithing  could have Scales, Wire, Rings, Rivits, Hilts, Guards, ect that are crafted first and then combined with other raw and processed resources.

New Type of Pattern

One of my pet ideas when it has come to crafting was the concept of Meta Patterns, given more recent terminology in WoW a Heirloom pattern.  It creates an item where the ILevel of the output is based on the ILevel of the input.

If we are going to approach a mini-game requirement added to crafting I would rather it be an intellectual exercise like a puzzle than an interactive grind-fest like Vanguard.

Leave a Comment more...